What goals do we need in order to achieve your vision for the City 10-20 years from now? Include up to five goal statements.

Thinking of the theme areas for ReThink London (How we Live, Move, Green, Grow, and Prosper), provide up to five (5) goal statements that you feel would help the City achieve your vision for the future.

Comments

London is at maximum transit loading now, buses pass stops as they have no room but no relief bus is sent! So planning for 2023 or 2033 London needs a high speed core transit system. If this can be linked to high speed rail then the growth of London will be much faster than without the HSR

The above need is aggrevated by city planning mushrooming outwards when undeveloped land exists close to city centre. Planning means planning not dreaming. City needs to purchase land before zoning outwards, and farmers wanting high landrates should be shut out by moving the city not the farmer.

More traffic crossings should be pedestrian controlled. The national standard is one set of lights every 800m but several locations in London there are more causing conjestion. Pedestrian controlled lights have been installed at Talbot & Dundas, but should also be used on Richmond, and on York at Greyhound & Via.

High rise buildings should only be built where infrastructure such as shopping and schools exist. The Toronto Lakeshore building shows what happens when no school or fire planmning. The Hyde Park Condo is another example. Hyde Park is also an example of insufficient transit corridors. Traffic circles (roundabouts) should be sized so that fire engines can move through them not over them as on Beaverbrook extension. Rather than incorporating existing villages London needs to plan housing projects on a village format with local schools shops parks etc.

By 2023- especially if high speed rail is coming grade crossings between Clarke Rd and Talbot need to be replaced

Sewers will break and need to be routed away from city core.

Would it not make sense to build hi rise accomodations within existing,and proposed shopping centers? When I see Westmount going to hell,the demographics are such that the young have moved out .leaving often 2 or 1 persons in a huge home . These folks love their neighborhood,but often cannot function as when young,and those big homes ,wow!!the costs. If Westmount mall had ,say ,25 or more stories of Hi Rise in its heart ,with interdenonimational churches ,health care facilities ,and recreation facilities ,it would be Great!! .At the same time ,the two nearby churches,on HUGE lots,(churches pay NO TAX) could be sold as hirise developement land ,with the proceeds helping to set up the multi denominational church in the Westmount Mall tower.Not only rescuing the bankrupt churches,but providing a much more accessible venue for the aged as well as everyone else .As the population grows with the added services ,space,and conveniebces,the whole area will prosper on a logorithmic scale . Tha bg homes vacated by seniors and empty nesters would return to their original intended ueseag ashomes for growing families,.From the sale of their nestegg homes the elderly ,could easily afford to move into this tower and enjoy the auti\umn of life without the maintenance of a burdensome home .Also the need to encounter inclimate weather is eliminated as almost EVERY need can be accomodated within the tower and Mall.This is how you turn a white elephant nto a monumental devlopement,everyone wins . And ,yes ,the sewers in Westmount can handle this developement ,as can other services .

Would it not make sense to build hi rise accomodations within existing,and proposed shopping centers? When I see Westmount going to hell,the demographics are such that the young have moved out .leaving often 2 or 1 persons in a huge home . These folks love their neighborhood,but often cannot function as when young,and those big homes ,wow!!the costs. If Westmount mall had ,say ,25 or more stories of Hi Rise in its heart ,with interdenonimational churches ,health care facilities ,and recreation facilities ,it would be Great!! .At the same time ,the two nearby churches,on HUGE lots,(churches pay NO TAX) could be sold as hirise developement land ,with the proceeds helping to set up the multi denominational church in the Westmount Mall tower.Not only rescuing the bankrupt churches,but providing a much more accessible venue for the aged as well as everyone else .As the population grows with the added services ,space,and conveniebces,the whole area will prosper on a logorithmic scale . Tha bg homes vacated by seniors and empty nesters would return to their original intended ueseag ashomes for growing families,.From the sale of their nestegg homes the elderly ,could easily afford to move into this tower and enjoy the auti\umn of life without the maintenance of a burdensome home .Also the need to encounter inclimate weather is eliminated as almost EVERY need can be accomodated within the tower and Mall.This is how you turn a white elephant nto a monumental devlopement,everyone wins . And ,yes ,the sewers in Westmount can handle this developement ,as can other services .

Reduce costs of Police department by shifting mental health problems of citizens to mental health professionals. Form a coalition of professionals to deal with mentally ill street people. Police need to catch criminals not deal with the paper work of mentally ill people.
Increase population density downtown.
Make riverfront a destination of shops and places to eat.
New concert hall
Build a major grocery store downtown !!!!! so you can get dry goods.

I could say that the following eight principles express my future vision for London (and they do) but the eight points are taken from a site on the planning direction being proposed for Chinese cities of tomorrow. One thing ReThink London must do is widen the search for good, inspirational planning ideas.

The eight principles:

1 Develop neighborhoods that promote walking
2 Prioritize bicycle networks
3 Create dense networks of streets and paths
4 Support high-quality transit
5 Zone for mixed-use neighborhoods
6 Match density to transit capacity
7 Create compact regions with short commutes
8 Increase mobility by regulating parking and road use

These principles depend on and reinforce each other. Together, they are a recipe for success.
http://www.efchina.org/csepupfiles/news/201212891110262.7860111479964.pdf/planning_cities_final_english_march_2011.pdf

Yes I saw the CTV News video clip
and I give the city of London the green light
and I would like to see the Street KIPPS LANE get rename
to Damien Warner Avenue,I hope the purposal gets Approve very soon.

The community should have a sense of interconnected-ness, and volunteers should be welcomed to help run extra-curricular activities in the high schools. There should be measures set into place so that these can be run for the benefit of the students, and not at the expense of the teachers' own time and energy.

Move Goal: To have a convenient & efficient, environmentally-friendly multi-modal transportation system.

Green Goal: To promote environmental literacy to increase innovation & adoption of green initiatives among all residents and businesses.

Prosper Goal: To create an economic environment that encourages innovation and retains a high percentage of Western University & Fanshawe College graduates.

Live Goal: To remove barriers to residents' engagement in their meaningfull activities.

Grow Goal: To protect proximity of services and green space in urban development.

City Hall needs to seriously look at how the environment is being taken for granted. An example, clear cutting the grass whether it needs cutting or not - it dries out the earth.

Create more 'uncut' where simple beneficial plants promote the health of our plants and trees.

Workshop-in-a-box:
Empower citzens (give people discretion with tax dollars)
Do not move the urban growth boundary (minimize sprawl)
Enforce the OP and City by-laws
Do neighbourhood plans for existing neighbourhoods
Create a social hub in new neighbourhoods.
Better walkability (wider sidewalks, good lighting).
OP should provide "sticks and carrots".
Town Hall meetings between Councillors and communities.
Ethics commissioner.

Workshop-in-a-box:
Prioritize transportation method (platinum level cycling certification).
Mixed-use neighbourhoods (live/work), more types of businesses in the area, sense of community, encourage small stores (discourage big-box).
Create an environment that attract job creators.
Stop dumping raw sewage into Thames River.
30 % anarual area cover and 40% urban canopy cover.
Remove tax incentives for vacant commercial properties.
Designated zone for bikes.
Small commercial centre in each community.
More brownfield developments.
Establish better routes for bus.
Create incentives for energy efficient homes.
Spaces for Youth.
Develop river banks naturally.
Recognize culture and the arts as an economic driver and essential quality of life.

Workshop-in-a-box:
Neighbourhood Focus.
Firm City Boundary.
Increase tolerance to risk.
City Council accountability.
Stewardship of public space.
Big Thinking.
City and County collaboration/Regional focus.
Connect the River.
Publicly owned utilities.
Public education on issues (eg. the budget).

Workshop-in-a-box:
Zero based budgeting on actual needs.
Set aside funding for a ring road.
Invest in public transit.
Invest in multi-passenger lanes to improve movement.
Better zoning policies.
Celebrate London.
Promote 401 corridor.
Utilize student community and their hours.
Encourage residential building downtown.
Improve City of London website.
Public/private partnerships.

Rethink London as a sustainable, low-carbon community.

Seven rules for such a community advocated by landscape architect, Patrick Condon (2010):

1. Restore the streetcar city (London used to have a streetcar system)
- adopt 'streetcar city' as a unifying principle
- influence the pattern of walking and riding through associated urban form
- promote continuous linear corridors, not stand-alone nodes
- invest in an urban future

2. Design an interconnected street system
- consider ideal block and parcel size, road width, fire access, queuing streets, the corner, lanes and alleys

3. Locate commercial services, frequent transit and schools within a five minute walk
- heighten sense of place in corridors
- link transit, density and the five minute walk
- design for the bus or streetcar
- facilitate the walk to school

4. Locate good jobs close to affordable housing types
- reestablish, encourage and support the historic relationship between work and home

5. Provide a diversity of housing types
- decrease greenhouse gas production through appropriate building type
- make single-famly homes sustainable
- build and adapt neighbourhoods for all ages and incomes

6. Create a linked system of natural areas and parks
- adopt ecological design principles, for example: "The site is to the region as the cell is to the body; just as the health of the individual human cell has everything to do with the health of the human body, so too does the ecological function of the individual site have everything to do with the ecological health of the region."

7. Invest in lighter, greener, cheaper, smarter infrastructure
- protect watershed function
- promote infiltration
- require green infrastructure for parcels
- require pervious paved surfaces or impervious paved surfaces with infiltration zones

Live: We have to start thinking in terms of sustainability for all facets of life. Garbage collection could be twice a month coupled with a proper recycling program and green-bin solution. Unrecylable Packaging needs to be returned to the store/retailer who sold it, so that they in turn return it to the manufacturer. This worked in Germany: now packaging is all recyclable and has reduced costs for producers, consumers, and governments. More local shops and pedestrian walkways (i.e. Dundas from Talbot to Colborne) would increase enjoyment of the city. Look at Calgary's 8th Street or various European capital cities for thriving pedestrian areas that were former roads.

Move: The LTC is trash right now; needs to be completely scrapped and started from scratch. Continuous loops around major roadways (with transfers at intersections) with large busses and smaller busses going into subdivisions (where needed) is much more cost-effective. High-speed rail from Windsor to Quebec City would be ideal, making London a 1-hour trip to Toronto and the U.S. border. All of this would reduce single-occupancy vehicle trips. More bike lanes are also needed. (Hamilton Road east of Wellington currently under construction: why are there going to be large concrete barriers in the middle, which is room that could have been used for bike lanes?)

Green: Stop burning fossil fuels and using nuclear power for energy. Conservation efforts through renewable thermal (solar and geothermal) and using renewable electricity (solar and wind), in combination with hydro-electric from Ontario and imports from Manitoba and Quebec can sustain us.

Grow: No more urban sprawl!! It's as simple as that. We need that prime farm land for food production. Need to go back to the 100-acre farm (and make it affordable with help from provincial/federal governments) to have sustainable, local food production. Intensify the downtown core and other centres (for example, the dying malls like Westmount) with high-rises, while preserving our architectural heritage and history. (e.g. don't tear down 199 Queens Ave: it can be built into the new building with some innovation) Put condo/apartment building on top of malls to make the shops sustainable.

Prosper: Encourage local businesses by going to them first for government contracts. Encourage citizens to engage with local businesses before seeking outside the city. Local businesses are the engine, and when they suffer, we enter the type of recession we are in now, with mega-corps keeping billions in their bank accounts and out of the economy, and small business struggles to stay afloat.

A main goal for the future should be to ensure London has the qualities to make it a "Healthy City." Such as:

- a strong, mixed, local economy resulting in a low unemployment rate
- densely populated, mixed-use neighbourhoods (http://rockinontheblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/rethink-london-answer-is-fused-grid.html)
- thought given to form-based zoning and city-wide planning (http://www.formbasedcodes.org/)
- an excellent mass transit system (And keep your eyes open, as there's much more to rethinking transit than simply adding BRT service. Think of Paris, France, and what they are accomplishing there.)
- access to major highway or two, plus a modern airport and efficient rail connections
- a stable or growing population
- good schools and respected university and communty college
- green spaces and lots of neighbourhood parks (http://rockinontheblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/rethink-london-rethink-suburbia.html)
- low crime rate
- working farms on outer edge of the city (http://rockinontheblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/rethink-london-rethinking-abandoned.html)
- open to new ideas found around the globe (http://rockinontheblog.blogspot.ca/2012/06/rethink-london-rethinking-car-ownership.html) or this from Birmingham, Michigan (http://www.a2gov.org/a2d2/designguidelines/Documents/Seminar3Birmingham.pdf)
- a healthy downtown --- not necessary the heart of the city as it was in the past but certainly a healthy place

That's just a start.

JOBS = CARING = GROWTH

If there where more jobs available people wouldn't have to worry about next meal, paycheck or how going to pay the bills. With this stress lifted I am sure more Londoners would get involved in the community they live in!
Ban all temp. agencies so people have chances at real stable employment. Too many people being caught up in the 3 month cycle and out of work. People will worry about themselves and their neighbors before the city!

Do we want to grow the population of london? How does it benefit the homeowner?

---- Your house will be worth more. You will have more services and greater entertainment.

How do we get more people to see London as home or even to see it at all?

---- When people drive down the 401 highway (50,000 a day), they have no choice but to look at the roadside and maybe even stop here in London. There is nothing to see on the 401 here in London right now.

If there is a traffic jam / blizzard / bathroom break / hunger / boredom / screaming kids / shopping available / casinos / entertainment available for their gazing eyes to look at, they might actually stop in.

Statistics... Canada's busiest Mcdonald's is on the 401 highway in Cambridge. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Busiest_McDonald's_in_Canada

Square One Mall which is on the 401 highway has millions of visitors each year.
http://shopsquareone.com/group-planners

Advertising is expensive and is the ONLY way to sell a product or service.

If London wants EXTRA money, it's in the pockets of people who are driving by us right now!

We don't need new stores, commercial space, office space unless it's built on the 401. We need people that DON'T live here and that are capable of spending money.

The s.w.a.p plan is terrible. All this new development will only at best change where we shop and hurt the businesses which are already competing with each other.
Us Londoners already have plenty of places to shop and the Internet is making it even easier and WAY cheaper.
This will create jobs if we build on the 401.

I think it's called nepotism and cronyism and CASH. It's the only reason we are building stuff we don't need.

If we want more jobs and better health, then our local food supply should be converted to organic. This means no more sprays allowed on our food or land. If we don't spray then we need manual labour (thousands of people) to get rid of weeds and pests.

The whole world will aspire to this place we call the forest city, and the animals/insects/fish will thanks us too!

All city core businesses and residences should be required to adhere to the blue box recycle program.

Why is there no blue box program for the core area ?

London, like Chicago, should set a goal of reducing pedestrian deaths to zero in 10 years. Chicago has a pedestrian safety plan. Does London? We have to stop reinventing the wheel and just adapt the things that are working elsewhere.

Here's an interesting article:
http://bettercities.net/article/chicago-pedestrians-safety-first-18833

Here's Chicago's plan:
http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/cdot/supp_info/ChicagoPedestrianPlanWeb.pdf

Hamilton can improve pedestrian safety with more 'complete streets'. (cbc.ca)

http://www.cbc.ca/hamilton/news/story/2012/10/10/hamilton-pedestrian-deaths.html

no pollution

bike or walk

student park clean up

million tree challenge

Greener recycling

Less car use more biking

No litter (more punishments)

Lots of comments about rejecting urban sprawl. How about this... London should set a goal that the average COMMUTE is less than 30 minutes. This can be accomplished by limiting the size of the city combined with a more efficient transportation system.

The linked article (http://persquaremile.com/2012/08/22/commute-time/) is pretty persuasive. When people decide where to work and where to live they seem to be setting 30 minutes as the appropriate commute time.

Of the five goals that matter, I would recommend:
1. An end to taxpayer-costly low-density developments at the City edge and within City boundaries, whether they be residential or commercial in nature;
2. Charging development fees that reflect the real cost of initial development as well as the real long-run maintenance cost of associated City infrastructure supporting such development;
3. Ensuring that the taxes paid on commercial properties reflect the real cost of maintaining the public infrastructure that supports them;
4. Ensuring that the urban landscape is an intensified, attractive and enjoyable mix of commercial and residential properties, parks and people-centric streetscapes. Key here is an inter-mixed landscape of affordable density, where houses, apartments and businesses share the same landscape. The Old South area around Wortley Village is a great model for the future, for example;
5. Reconciling all of the elements of the Official Plan such that the Official Plan is truly consistent with the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement on land use planning (PPS). Not just for the sake of it--but because the PPS is a good if very basic starter set of objective planning policies that can guide the achievement of Points 1-4 above. The Ontario Government requirement by law is that all planning decisions and all official plans must be PPS-consistent. I am a little surprised that the Rethink process invites public speculation without noting this requirement.

London needs to establish Noise Level Standards to be considered in the development and expansion of the road network and the land use (zoning) along those roadways.

Folks may not realize the amount of 24/7 noise associated with major thoroughfares like Highbury, 401, 402, Richmond North, Oxford, Wellington South, Wonderland, Fanshawe Park Rd, etc. We need much bigger buffers between residential development and these roads just to accommodate the noise created by today's traffic.

I'm not sure whether there are standards in the Official Plan but when I think about the idea of expanding Fanshawe to 6 lanes I feel sorry for the folks living in those neighbourhoods.

London needs to set a goal of improving the Water Quality of the Thames River to acceptable cleanliness by investing in sanitary treatment facilities and advanced monitoring of the watershed.

London needs to set a goal of re-establishing the Beach and public swimming at Fanshawe by working with the Conservation Authority and world-famous Trojan Technologies on a solution to the pollution problem there. Most Londoners don't realize that there is a yacht club at Fanshawe as well as the Olympic Rowing Facility. What about canoeing, scuba diving, sport fishing, and similar pursuits. Can these be re-established in the next 10 years?

In the Nature of Things episode referenced below David Suzuki visits Toronto's waterfront where they are filtering lake water through a park system and returning it to the lake with remarkable results, i.e.: cleaning the lake. A possibility for Fanshawe Lake and the Thames River? Does the fountain at the Forks perform this function?

http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/episode/suzuki-diaries-future-city.html

If we stop polluting we won't need to filter the water.

I agree completely. We are lucky to have such a beautiful river running through the city. With the city putting money into creating parks and paths along the riverside, I think the next logical step is to create an offical group of paid workers/volunteers who at least once a month would help keep the river and areas clean. Having each neighbourhood assigned to a part of the river would be a great way to get the youth and adults in those areas motivated to clean their part on more then just earth day.

Has anyone heard of Landfill Mining and Reclamation? With Toronto's landfill on our doorstep and our own dump, London could become a leader in processing the contents of landfills to extract any valuable materials and extend the life of these facilities.

I totally agree with the suggestions to roll out the green bin program but let's set a goal of going from 'follower' to 'world leader' in the next 10 years by working with Western, Fanshawe or private partners to create a Landfill Mining demonstration project.

In the Nature of Things episode referenced below David Suzuki visits Edmonton's waste treatment operations where they are recycling much more than we do. Perhaps London can't be a world leader but we can at least try to catch up.

http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/episode/suzuki-diaries-future-city.html

More on using our proximity to Toronto's landfill to our advantage.
http://thisbigcity.net/three-projects-why-recovering-energy-landfill-makes-sense/

London should build on the "Beck" heritage by leading in the development of Electric Car Charging Infrastructure and converting a potion of the City's fleet to electricity. We already have propane powered police cars and natural gas powered buses. We could work with parking lot owners, hospitals, Western, Fanshawe, etc. to set up charging stations for public use. I see no reason why we have to wait for Toronto to start down this road.

Here's an article about changes happening elsewhere. http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/03/03/technology-better-place.html

And in case you were unaware - Sir Adam Beck (June 20, 1857 – August 15, 1925) was Mayor of London and a hydroelectricity advocate who founded the Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario.

Unless the situation has changed, the LTC has dumped all its natural gas powered buses.

http://www.lfpress.com/2012/10/04/sun-country-highway-ltd-installed-the-first-plug-in-west-of-toronto

Somebody is paying attention. We have our first charging station. Let's hope the first of many.

There are groups who measure the WALKABILITY of a neighbourhood. (http://www.walkscore.com/) My own neighbourhood scores 27/100. OUCH!

London needs to set a goal of becoming the most walk friendly Canadian city between 250,000 and 500,000 residents in 10 years. Each year the Planning Department should measure and publish our Walkability scores to show that we are progressing.

WALK Friendly Ontario (http://walkfriendly.ca/) is piloting a new assessment tool. London should participate. Nuff said!

Londoners need to enthusiastically embrace and endorse the "Smart Moves Transportation Master Plan". The Planning Department needs to incorporate the recommendations in the updated Official Plan. And City Council needs to move on the "Immediate Action Plan" demonstrating to citizens and regional neighbours that we are a positive, forward-thinking community. Dwelling on our past, bemoaning change, dragging our feet, etc. is not going to build the "City of Opportunity".

Sorry, I should have included a link to the Transportation Master Plan (TMP).

Executive Summary
http://www.london.ca/Transportation_Planning/pdfs/June2012_Executive_Summary.pdf

Smart Moves site
http://www.london.ca/d.aspx?s=/Transportation_Planning/default.htm

Remove Fluoride in our water!

Promote more education about vaccinations through the teachings of this great resource:
http://www.drpalevsky.com/

Get rid of the letters from the Middlesex health unit..threating suspension if your child doesn't get vaccinated.

No smoking within 30 feet of any child under the age of 18.

In recent months there has been considerable press time paid to London’s role in agribusiness. But just as the city is emerging as a centre of this kind of activity, it can serve as a centre in many other ways, too.

London is the largest centre within an economic trading region of more than one million people. The city is a central clearing house for many social and health services. Despite this concentration, no reliable daily public transit services have been established between the city and its outlying communities. Areas like the Niagara Region and Chatham-Kent have acknowledged that it is crucial to provide regional transportation service. For London, it could mean a huge boost to the local economy and a consolidation of a regional identity for the area that’s wedged between two Great Lakes, and area that could potentially become the Greater London Area.

With regular public transit it becomes easy for skilled workers to live in Grand Bend and commute to London. A broader region provides many more attractions to draw future residents: access to world-class beaches and environmentally significant areas, for example, would appeal to both younger and older demographics. Easy access to a broader base of employment opportunity – and to consumers – would draw both employees and businesses alike. With a superb public transit system, artists, writers and musicians, who have been shown time and again to be key participants in revitalizing communities, would have a choice of affordable, appropriate living and working space. Providing a way for these creative people to easily connect with each other and to the facilities and institutions that represent them would help to create that critical mass needed to ensure a lively, vital arts community. For new bio-chemical businesses in Sarnia a regional public transit system would mean the possibility of developing internship or co-operative programs that would be feasible for those studying at Fanshawe and the University of Western Ontario to access. Conversely, such transport would provide a way for new agri-business within the city to be able to access workers living on-farm, not only keeping dollars earned within the local economy but keeping them sector specific and creating greater security for family farm-based ventures. A regional transportation system would make it possible for tourists to choose London as a well rounded holiday destination that provides access to area beaches and some of Canada’s best theatre.

Enhancing transit within the city by working out rail transport on existing lines at key travel times during the day would also create efficiencies and improve access for the city’s residents. It could be as simple as identifying four main stops along either the CP or CN railway system as urban stops and deploying bus services around those hubs.

A regional governing authority would likely need to also be developed to reflect the interests of the region. That in itself would be a daunting task. But those efforts do not have to come first to develop regional transit. Perhaps developing something like a regional transit system may be the way for our area municipalities to determine what sort of formal structure eventually needs to be put in place.

One of your questions is what makes a healthy city. Community engagement, is my thought. And to obtain this engagement there’s a need for better transitions between first, second and third spaces. For instance, many of the city’s community arenas are isolated from either commercial districts that offer diverse services or residential districts. The ice pad at the Western Fair is a good example of this, or the city’s soccer parks. Where are the areas where people can gather after a game or before? Where is the library that a parent can slip into while their child is at hockey practice? The coffee shop? Where are the community centres that nestle into neighbourhoods? They happen in some areas of the city but not in enough.

As for walking and biking, more barriers need to be removed between downtown and the river and the surrounding neighbourhoods. And where are the public greenhouses that could provide some great interior public space in the colder months?

While it is good to see London’s public art program begin to take shape, there have been many poorly conceived projects that seem to have been conducted with enthusiasm but with little sense of what makes for world class art. The metal trees in the city’s downtown, for example, are an embarrassment. The murals in Covent Garden Market should be removed. There have been some examples where the process worked – the mural on Citi Plaza’s on King Street is an example of a positive location. But where is the city’s sculpture garden where work can be displayed and changed throughout the year?

The development of the hospital lands will be key to encouraging the vitality of the city’s centre for future generations. But perhaps simply looking at residential development isn’t the answer. Is there a way that the city could work with UWO and/or Fanshawe to look at developing those lands to address the future needs of these very important institutions?

Mary, can I simply "like" your well thought-out and well written contribution to the conversation. You reinforce several of my own ideas re: region-building here and in the previous Likes/Dislikes collection. I hope the Planning Department is taking note. Thanks.

London's retail space allowance should be lowered to a sustainable 40 sq. ft. per capita to take into account the trend to on-line shopping, sustainable forms (not big box), accommodations for public transit, etc.